Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

JULITO SAGALES v. RUSTAN'S COMMERCIAL CORPORATION

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR No. 185829 2012-04-25	ARMANDO ALILING v. JOSE B. FELICIANO VELASCO JR., J.
Following the pronouncements of this Court Sagales v. Rustan's Commercial Corporation,[43] the computation of separation pay in lieu of reinstatement includes the period for which backwages were awarded: Thus, in lieu of reinstatement, it is but proper to award petitioner separation pay computed at one-month salary for every year of service, a fraction of at least six (6) months considered as one whole year. In the computation of separation pay, the period where backwages are awarded must be included. (Emphasis supplied.)
	GR No. 187122 2012-02-22	NEGROS SLASHERS v. ALVIN L. TENG VILLARAMA, JR., J.
In Sagales v. Rustan's Commercial Corporation,[29] this Court ruled: Truly, while the employer has the inherent right to discipline, including that of dismissing its employees, this prerogative is subject to the regulation by the State in the exercise of its police power.
	GR No. 162017 2010-04-23	CALTEX v. HERMIE G. AGAD CARPIO, J.
In Sagales v. Rustan's Commercial Corporation,[35] we held that in loss of trust and confidence, as a just cause for dismissal, it is sufficient that there must only be some basis for the loss of trust and confidence or that there is reasonable ground to believe, if not to entertain the moral conviction, that the employee concerned is responsible for the misconduct and that his participation in the misconduct rendered him absolutely unworthy of trust and confidence.
	GR No. 141851 2002-01-16	DIRECT FUNDERS HOLDINGS CORPORATION v. JUDGE CELSO D. LAVIÑA PARDO, J.
The conditional sale agreement was the only document that the respondent presented during the summary hearing of the application for a temporary restraining order before the Regional Trial Court, Branch 71, Pasig City.[11]