This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2006-01-31 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| Given respondent's purely ministerial role in the execution of judgments, he is under duty to proceed with reasonable celerity and promptness to execute judgments according to their mandate, [18] otherwise, they become empty victories of the prevailing party. [19] But respondent failed to discharge this duty. | |||||