This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2015-07-22 |
PERLAS-BERNABE, J. |
||||
| On February 10, 1960, Felisa supposedly sold the subject property to one of her daughters, Bella Guerrero (Bella), the latter's husband, Delfin Guerrero, Sr. (Delfin, Sr.), and Felimon Buenaventura, Sr. (Felimon, Sr.), Felisa's common-law husband.[7] Bella, co-petitioner in G.R. No. 212045, and Delfin, Sr. paid P15,000.00 as consideration therefor.[8] Thus, TCT No. 45951/T-233 in the name of Felisa was cancelled and TCT No. 49869[9] was issued in the names of Felimon, Sr. and Bella, married to Delfin, Sr.. | |||||
|
2005-01-21 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| It must be stated that the filing of the instant petition for certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court is inappropriate. Considering that the Resolution of the Sandiganbayan which quashed the Information was a final order that finally disposed of the case, the proper remedy therefrom is a petition for review under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court.[22] Section 1 of said rule provides:Filing of petition with Supreme Court. A party desiring to appeal by certiorari from a judgment or final order or resolution of the Court of Appeals, the Sandiganbayan, the Regional Trial Court or other courts whenever authorized by law, may file with the Supreme Court a verified petition for review on certiorari. The petition shall raise only questions of law which must be distinctly set forth. | |||||