This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2015-12-07 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
| Solidum further alleges that he was denied the right to cross-examine the witnesses who submitted affidavits in favor of Smart; thus, the affidavits must be considered hearsay and inadmissible. In support of such contention, Solidum cites Naguit v. National Labor Relations Commission[26] | |||||