You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

IN MATTER OF ALLEGED IMPROPER CONDUCT OF SANDIGANBAYAN ASSOCIATE JUSTICE ANACLETO D. BADOY v. ASSOCIATE JUSTICES ANACLETO D. BADOY

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

AM No. P-02-1565
2004-10-18
JUDGE MA. MONINA S. MISAJON v. CLERK OF COURT LAGRIMAS A. FERANIL
YNARES-SATIAGO, J.
As we mentioned earlier, judges are subject to human limitations. Imbedded in their consciousness is the complex of emotions, habits and convictions. Aware of this actuality, it behooves them to regulate these deflecting forces and not to let them loose, either to their own detriment or to that of the courts they serve. This is the high price they have to pay as occupants of their exalted positions.[15] (Italics ours)
GR Nos. 158780-82
2004-10-12
PEOPLE v. SANDIGANBAYAN
QUISUMBING, J.
The Office of the Special Prosecutor moved for reconsideration of the denial,[6] citing this Court's ruling in A.M. No. 01-12-01-SC and A.M. No. SB-02-10-J that "[t]he setting of the hearing of the plunder case three times a week is in order, not only because the case is of national concern, but more importantly, because the accused are presently detained."[7]