This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2012-08-15 |
BERSAMIN, J. |
||||
| Thirdly, the core issue in an action for the recovery of possession of realty like this one concerned only the priority right to the possession of the realty.[21] As such, Numeriano's assertion of ownership in his own right could not be finally and substantively determined herein, for it was axiomatic that the adjudication of the question of ownership in an action for the recovery of possession of realty would only be provisional and would not even be a bar to an action between the same parties involving the ownership of the same property.[22] | |||||
|
2003-07-31 |
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J. |
||||
| In any event, judgment rendered in the instant case shall not bar an action between the same parties respecting title to the land or building, nor shall it be conclusive as to the facts therein found in a case between the same parties upon a different cause of action involving possession. Any pronouncement made on the question of ownership in this case is provisional in nature.[34] | |||||