This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2005-12-15 |
CORONA, J. |
||||
| In this case, the labor arbiter's finding, affirmed by the NLRC, was that the sales record of respondent and the time he spent in the field were "clear indications of complainant's inefficiency and/or negligence."[17] Inefficiency implies negligence, incompetence, ignorance and carelessness.[18] Negligence is the want or lack of care required by the circumstances.[19] | |||||