This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2012-11-26 |
DEL CASTILLO, J. |
||||
| Appellant wittingly overlooked the fact that during the pre-trial, the prosecution and the defense stipulated that the specimen submitted for examination was positive for Methylamphetamine Hydrochloride, a dangerous drug, per Physical Science Report No. D-925-03S.[11] This was the very reason why the testimony of the forensic chemist was dispensed with during the trial. Stipulation of facts at the pre-trial constitutes judicial admissions which are binding and conclusive upon the parties.[12] | |||||