Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR NO. 169933 2007-03-09	SU ZHI SHAN v. PEOPLE CARPIO MORALES, J.
Case law has it that the forensic chemist is not mandated to examine the entire mass of shabu confiscated by the policemen xxx. It is enough that a sample of the said substance be subjected to qualitative examination. x x x [A] sample taken from one package is logically presumed to be representative of the entire contents of the package unless proven otherwise by the accused himself.[55] (Citations omitted; Emphasis and underscoring supplied)
	GR NO. 150877 2006-05-04	ELIDAD KHO v. ENRICO LANZANAS CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
We also declared in People v. Chiu,[49] citing Malaloan v. Court of Appeals,[50] that a search warrant is merely a judicial process designed by the Rules to respond only to an incident in the main case, if one has already been instituted, or in anticipation thereof.