Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 171626 2014-08-06	OLONGAPO CITY v. SUBIC WATER BRION, J.
A judgment on a compromise agreement is immediately executory and is considered to have been entered on the date it was approved by the trial court.[36] Since the compromise agreement was approved and adopted by the trial court on June 13, 1997, this should be the reckoning date for the counting of the period for the filing of a valid motion for issuance of a writ of execution. Petitioner thus had until June 13, 2002, to file its motion.
	GR NO. 124512 2006-06-27	MA. ROSARIO SUAREZ v. JUDGE MARTIN S. VILLARAMA TINGA, J.
In the case at bar, petitioner has not demonstrated any cogent reason for the Court to take an exception. Petitioner committed a blatant disregard of the basic procedural rules in appeals. The 15-day reglementary period for the filing of the motion for reconsideration is mandatory and jurisdictional.[20] Furthermore, the filing of the wrong mode of appeal to this Court is a patent ground for its dismissal.
	GR No. 147227 2004-11-19	MARIA REMEDIOS ARGANA v. REPUBLIC TINGA, J,
The Court has previously held that as applied to a judgment based on compromise, both the sixty (60)-day and six (6)-month reglementary periods within which to file a petition for relief should be reckoned from the date when the decision approving the compromise agreement was rendered because such judgment is considered immediately executory and entered on the date that it was approved by the court.[47]