You're currently signed in as:
User

SPS. RAUL v. CITIBANK

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

2015-06-17
BRION, J.
Contracts have the force of law between the parties and must be complied with in good faith.[44] A contracting party’s failure, without legal reason, to comply with contract stipulations breaches their contract and can be the basis for the award of damages to the other contracting party.[45]
2013-02-18
BERSAMIN, J.
In this regard, whether or not the Trust Receipt/SCS was a contract of adhesion apparently prepared by PPI would neither dilute nor erase her liabilities. A contract of adhesion prepared by one party, usually a corporation, is generally not a one-sided document as long as the signatory is not prevented from studying it before signing. Gloria did not show that she was deprived of that opportunity to study the contract. At any rate, the social stature of the parties, the nature of the transaction, and the amount involved were also factors to be considered in determining whether the aggrieved party "exercised adequate care and diligence in studying the contract prior to its execution."[48] Thus, "[u]nless a contracting party cannot read or does not understand the language in which the agreement is written, he is presumed to know the import of his contract and is bound thereby."[49] Here, Gloria was married to a lawyer who was also then the Municipal Mayor of Aliaga. Both of them signed the list of conjugal assets that they used to support the application for the credit line.
2011-02-23
VELASCO JR., J.
Fourth, the solidary liability of Gonzales is clearly stipulated in the promissory notes which uniformly begin, "For value received, the undersigned (the "BORROWER") jointly and severally promise to pay x x x."  Solidary liability cannot be presumed but must be established by law or contract.[22]  Article 1207 of the Civil Code pertinently states that "there is solidary liability only when the obligation expressly so states, or when the obligation requires solidarity."  This is true in the instant case where Gonzales, as accommodation party, is immediately, equally, and absolutely bound with the spouses Panlilio on the promissory notes which indubitably stipulated solidary liability for all the borrowers.  Moreover, the three promissory notes serve as the contract between the parties.  Contracts have the force of law between the parties and must be complied with in good faith.[23]