This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2014-04-08 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| Thereafter, the Court directed the parties to submit their respective memoranda within sixty (60) days and, at the same time posed several questions for their clarification on some contentions of the parties.[64] | |||||
|
2014-04-08 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| Thereafter, the Court directed the parties to submit their respective memoranda within sixty (60) days and, at the same time posed several questions for their clarification on some contentions of the parties.[64] | |||||
|
2012-10-24 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| Similarly, in Tulfo v. People,[33] therein petitioners, who were Managing Editor, National Editor of Remate publication, President of Carlo Publishing House, and one who does typesetting, editing, and layout of the page, claim that they had no participation in the editing or writing of the subject articles which will hold them liable for the crime of libel and, thus, should be acquitted. In debunking this argument, the Court stressed that an editor or manager of a newspaper, who has active charge and control over the publication, is held equally liable with the author of the libelous article. This is because it is the duty of the editor or manager to know and control the contents of the paper, and interposing the defense of lack of knowledge or consent as to the contents of the articles or publication definitely will not prosper. | |||||