This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2014-04-07 |
SERENO, C.J. |
||||
| Having held that a surety upon demand fails to pay, it can be held liable for interest, even if in thus paying, its liability becomes more than the principal obligation.[54] The increased liability is not because of the contract, but because of the default and the necessity of judicial collection.[55] | |||||