Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

FLORA BAUTISTA v. FELICIDAD CASTILLO MERCADO

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR No. 194328 2015-07-01	STRONGHOLD INSURANCE COMPANY v. INTERPACIFIC CONTAINER SERVICES PEREZ, J.
We reiterate, and follow, the established rule that factual findings of the trial court are.entitled to respect and are not to be disturbed on appeal, unless of some facts and circumstances of weight and substance, having been overlooked or misinterpreted, might materially affect the disposition of the case.[11] We apply the rule in the case. The exception has not been shown.
	GR No. 183202 2014-06-02	ALBERTO ALMOJUELA Y VILLANUEVA v. PEOPLE BRION, J.
As a final note, the general rule is that factual findings of the trial court, especially when affirmed by the CA, deserve great weight and respect.[33] These factual findings should not be disturbed on appeal, unless these are facts of weight and substance that were overlooked or misinterpreted and that would materially affect the disposition of the case.[34]
	GR No. 180992 2009-09-04	ELMER DIAMANTE Y SIOSON v. PEOPLE CARPIO MORALES, J.
Factual findings of the trial court are entitled to respect and are not to be disturbed on appeal, unless some facts and circumstances of weight and substance, having been overlooked or misinterpreted, might materially affect the disposition of the case.[28] In the case at bar, the Court finds that the trial court did not overlook, misapprehend, or misapply any fact of value to warrant a reversal of its findings. Prevailing jurisprudence uniformly holds that findings of fact of the trial court, especially when affirmed by the appellate court, are binding upon this Court.[29]
	GR No. 176566 2009-04-16	ELISEO EDUARTE Y. COSCOLLA v. VS.PEOPLE CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
Factual findings of the trial court are entitled to respect and are not to be disturbed on appeal, unless some facts and circumstances of weight and substance, having been overlooked or misinterpreted, might materially affect the disposition of the case.[8] In the case under consideration, we find that the trial court did not overlook, misapprehend, or misapply any fact or value for us to overturn the findings of the trial court. Prevailing jurisprudence uniformly holds that findings of fact of the trial court, particularly when affirmed by the Court of Appeals, are binding upon this Court.[9]