You're currently signed in as:
User

REPUBLIC v. GREGORIA L. DILOY

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2011-01-17
SERENO, J.
Thus, pursuant to the afore-quoted provision of law, applicants for registration of title must prove the following: (1) that the subject land forms part of the disposable and alienable lands of the public domain; and (2) that they have been in open, continuous, exclusive and notorious possession and occupation of the land under a bona fide claim of ownership since 12 June 1945 or earlier.[11] Section 14 (1) of the law requires that the property sought to be registered is already alienable and disposable at the time the application for registration is filed.[12]
2009-06-30
VELASCO JR., J.
A review of subsequent and recent rulings by this Court shows that the pronouncement in Herbieto has been applied to Buenaventura v. Republic,[17] Republic v. Diloy,[18] Ponciano, Jr. v. Laguna Lake Development Authority,[19] and Preciosa v. Pascual.[20]  This Court's ruling in Naguit, on the other hand, has been applied to Republic v. Bibonia.[21]