Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. JAYSON TUAZON Y OLIA

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 177357 2012-10-17	PEOPLE v. VAL DELOS REYES MENDOZA, J.
The forensic evidence showing old lacerations of AAA's hymen corroborates her claim that she had been sexually assaulted. When a woman states that she had been raped, she says in effect all that is necessary to show that rape was committed.[36] When such testimony corresponds with medical findings, there is sufficient basis to conclude that the essential requisites of carnal knowledge have been established.[37] Contrary to what Delos Reyes would like the Court to believe, the bite marks on her neck, breasts and thighs are not indicative of sexual foreplay. Rather, these marks are badges of bestiality which are a testament to his depravity.
	GR No. 184809 2010-03-29	PEOPLE v. ANTHONY RANTE Y REYES PEREZ, J.
Lastly, when the testimony of the witness corresponds with medical findings, there is sufficient basis to conclude that the essential requisites of carnal knowledge have been established.[56]
	GR No. 186228 2010-03-15	PEOPLE v. ANTONIO LAUGA Y PINA PEREZ, J.
The consistent and forthright testimony of AAA detailing how she was raped, culminating with the penetration of appellant's penis into her vagina, suffices to prove that appellant had carnal knowledge of her. When a woman states that she has been raped, she says in effect all that is necessary to show that rape was committed.[77] Further, when such testimony corresponds with medical findings, there is sufficient basis to conclude that the essential requisites of carnal knowledge have been established.[78]