This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2011-08-31 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| Under Article 105[46] of the Revised Penal Code, the appellant is obliged to return the items he took from the spouses BBB and CCC. If appellant can no longer return the articles taken, he is obliged to make reparation for their value, taking into consideration their price and their special sentimental value to the offended parties.[47] Hence, the Court modifies the decision of the trial court, as affirmed by the CA, and directs the appellant to return the pieces of jewelry and valuables taken from the spouses BBB and CCC as enumerated in the Information[48] dated December 3, 2001 and proven during trial. Should restitution be no longer possible, appellant shall pay the spouses BBB and CCC the value of the stolen pieces of jewelry and valuables as determined by the trial court in the amount of PhP336,000.00. | |||||
|
2006-08-16 |
CALLEJO, SR., J. |
||||
| As to the damages, the RTC only awarded actual damages of P| 1,510.00 and civil indemnity of P50,000.00 to Clarissa. In line with settled jurisprudence, however, this Court rectifies the same and orders all ppellants to, jointly and severally, pay Clarissa Angeles P50,000.00 as moral damages and P50,000.00 as civil indemnity for the rape by Rodolfo Suyu; P50,000.00 as moral damages and P50,000.00 as civil indemnity for the rape by Francis Cainglet; and P30,000.00 as moral damages and P30,000.00 as civil indemnity for the sexual assault by Rodolfo Suyu.[93] | |||||