Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR NO. 149118 2006-02-16	FLAVIANA LIM CAJAYON v. SPS. SANTIAGO AND FORTUNATA BATUYONG TINGA, J.
[27] Varona v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 124148, 20 May 2004, 428 SCRA 577; Gener v. De Leon, G.R. No. 130730, 19 October 2001, 367 SCRA 631, citing Sps. Pedro Ong and Veronica Ong v. Socorro Parel and Hon. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 143173, 28 March 2001; Sarona v. Villegas, 131 Phil. 365 (1968).
	GR Nos. 154391-92 2004-09-30	SPS. ISMAEL AND TERESITA MACASAET v. SPS. VICENTE AND ROSARIO MACASAET PANGANIBAN, J.
In actions for unlawful detainer, possession that was originally lawful becomes unlawful upon the expiration or termination of the defendant's right to possess, arising from an express or implied contract.[30] In other words, the plaintiff's cause of action comes from the expiration or termination of the defendant's right to continue possession.[31] The case resulting therefrom must be filed within one year from the date of the last demand.