This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2006-09-19 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
| At the outset, it must be noted that this petition suffers from a serious procedural defect which would have warranted its outright dismissal. Since the petition attributes grave abuse of discretion on the part of the Court of Appeals in resolving an issue that was not raised in the appeal before it, what should have been filed was one for certiorari under Rule 65.[8] Nonetheless, we shall treat the petition as filed under Rule 45 and address the alleged error assigned by the petitioners. | |||||