This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2005-02-23 |
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J. |
||||
| In Ong v. Judge Rosete,[40] we held that:The Court will not shirk from its responsibility of imposing discipline upon erring members of the bench. At the same time, however, the Court should not hesitate to shield them from unfounded suits that only serve to disrupt rather than promote the orderly administration of justice. This Court could not be the instrument that would destroy the reputation of any member of the bench, by pronouncing guilt on mere speculation. | |||||