This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2006-08-18 |
SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J. |
||||
| First, a motion for reconsideration is needed before a petition for certiorari can be resorted to,[4] subject to some exceptions.[5] In this case, petitioner did not file with respondent court a motion for reconsideration of its assailed Resolution before it resorted to certiorari. Neither did it explain why it should be excused from complying with such requirement. | |||||