Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 187451 2012-08-29	JESUS VIRTUCIO MENDOZA, J.
Moreover, it is settled that a decision of the CA does not establish judicial precedent.[40] "The principle of stare decisis enjoins adherence by lower courts to doctrinal rules established by this Court in its final decisions. It is based on the principle that once a question of law has been examined and decided, it should be deemed settled and closed to further argument. "[41]
	GR No. 182431 2010-11-17	LAND BANK OF PHILIPPINES v. ESTHER ANSON RIVERA PEREZ, J.
We similarly upheld Republic's 12% per annum interest rate on the unpaid expropriation compensation in the following cases: Reyes v. National Housing Authority,[21] Land Bank of the Philippines v. Wycoco,[22] Republic v. Court of Appeals,[23] Land Bank of the Philippines v. Imperial,[24] Philippine Ports Authority v. Rosales-Bondoc,[25] Nepomuceno v. City of Surigao,[26] and Curata v. Philippine Ports Authority.[27]
	GR No. 164195 2009-12-04	APO FRUITS CORPORATION v. CA BERSAMIN, J.
Nepomuceno v. City of Surigao[55] and Ansaldo v. Tantuico, Jr.[56] invoked by AFC/HPI contain the declaration that "the value of the property expropriated shall earn interest at the legal rate until full payment is effected."