Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. PRISCILLA DEL NORTE

This case has been cited 7 times or more.

	GR No.191023 2013-02-06	DON DJOWEL SALES Y ABALAHIN v. PEOPLE VILLARAMA, JR., J.
In a prosecution for illegal possession of dangerous drugs, the following facts must be proven with moral certainty: (1) that the accused is in possession of the object identified as prohibited or regulated drug; (2) that such possession is not authorized by law; and (3) that the accused freely and consciously possessed the said drug.[15]
	GR No. 192237 2011-01-26	PEOPLE v. JACQUILINE PAMBID Y CORTEZ VELASCO JR., J.
Likewise, the prosecution has established all the elements of the crime of illegal possession of dangerous drugs in the same testimony of PO2 Collado. The elements are: (1) that the accused is in possession of the object identified as a prohibited or regulatory drug; (2) that such possession is not authorized by law; and (3) that the accused freely and consciously possessed the said drug.[36]
	GR No. 184805 2010-03-03	PEOPLE v. VICTORIO PAGKALINAWAN VELASCO JR., J.
Likewise, the prosecution was also able to prove with moral certainty the guilt of appellant for the crime of illegal possession of dangerous drugs. It was able to prove the following elements: (1) that the accused is in possession of the object identified as a prohibited or regulatory drug; (2) that such possession is not authorized by law; and (3) that the accused freely and consciously possessed the said drug.[18]
	GR No. 186471 2010-01-25	PEOPLE v. RODANTE DE LEON Y DELA ROSA VELASCO JR., J.
Likewise, the prosecution was able to prove that appellant is guilty of illegal possession of dangerous drugs with moral certainty. In the prosecution for illegal possession of dangerous drugs, the following elements must be proved with moral certainty: (1) that the accused is in possession of the object identified as a prohibited or regulatory drug; (2) that such possession is not authorized by law; and (3) that the accused freely and consciously possessed the said drug.[20]
	GR No. 185381 2009-12-16	PEOPLE v. DANILO CRUZ Y CULALA VELASCO JR., J.
Similarly, the testimony of PO3 Arago established that appellant was also found in possession of illegal drugs aside from what he sold to the poseur-buyer. In the prosecution of this crime, the following elements must be proved with moral certainty: (1) that the accused is in possession of the object identified as a prohibited or regulatory drug; (2) that such possession is not authorized by law; and (3) that the accused freely and consciously possessed the said drug.[13]
	GR No. 186497 2009-09-17	PEOPLE v. HASANADDIN GUIARA Y BANSIL VELASCO JR., J.
On the other hand, in the prosecution for illegal possession of dangerous drugs, the following elements must be proved with moral certainty: (1) that the accused is in possession of the object identified as a prohibited or regulatory drug; (2) that such possession is not authorized by law; and (3) that the accused freely and consciously possessed the said drug.[13]
	GR No. 153254 2004-09-30	PEOPLE v. EDEN DEL CASTILLO AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
In all criminal cases, it is appellant's constitutional right to be presumed innocent until the contrary is proved beyond reasonable doubt. Thus in People vs. Del Norte,[49] we said:We detest drug addiction in our society. However, we have the duty to protect appellant where the evidence presented shows "insufficient factual nexus" of her participation in the commission of the offense charged. In People vs. Laxa, we held: