Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

RE: ADMINISTRATIVE CASE FOR DISHONESTY

This case has been cited 7 times or more.

	AM No. P-14-3218 2014-07-08	SELECTION v. RONALDO D. TACA PER CURIAM
Citing Office of the Court Administrator v. Bermejo,[16] Re: Administrative Case for Dishonesty and Falsification of Official Document: Benjamin R. Katly, Information Technology Officer I, Systems Development for Judicial Application Division, MISO[17] and Retired Employee v. Merlyn G. Manubag,[18] the OCA found respondent guilty of dishonesty and falsification of official documents. They recommended that the administrative complaint be docketed as a regular administrative matter. They also recommended the dismissal of respondent from service with forfeiture of all retirement benefits, and disqualification from employment in any government office including government-owned and controlled corporations.[19]
	AM No. P-14-3218 2014-07-08	SELECTION v. RONALDO D. TACA PER CURIAM
In Re: Administrative Case for Dishonesty and Falsification of Official Document: Benjamin R. Katly:[34]
	AM No. P-14-3218 2014-07-08	SELECTION v. RONALDO D. TACA PER CURIAM
However, in accordance with this court's ruling in Re: Administrative Case for Dishonesty and Falsification of Official Document: Benjamin R. Katly,[39] all of respondent's leave credits accrued after his appointment on April 8, 1997 are forfeited, as his ineligibility retroacts to the date of his appointment.
	GR No. 190524 2014-02-17	MICHAELINA RAMOS BALASBAS v. PATRICIA B. MONAYAO DEL CASTILLO, J.
Finally, petitioner points out that public office is a public trust; a person aspiring for public office must observe honesty, "candor, and faithful compliance with the law."[26] Dishonesty remains the same whether it is committed in relation to the public official's duties or in the course of his private dealings: it reflects on his "character and exposes the moral decay which virtually destroys his honor, virtue and integrity."[27]
	AM No. P-08-2433 2009-09-25	JUDGE JENNY LIND ALDECOA-DELORINO v. MARILYN DE CASTRO REMIGIO-VERSOZA PER CURIAM
In Re: Administrative Case for Dishonesty and Falsification of Official Document: Benjamin Katly,[27] therein respondent falsified his PDS on two occasions, stating that he was a college graduate, first when he applied for the position of Computer Maintenance Technologist III and, second, when he sought promotion for the position of Information Technology Officer I in the Systems Development for Judicial Application Division, Management Information Systems Office (MISO) of this Court. He was found guilty of dishonesty and falsification of official document and dismissed from the service immediately, with forfeiture of all retirement benefits, except accrued leave credits earned when he was employed in positions for which he was qualified.
	GR No. 167916 2008-08-26	SARAH P. AMPONG v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION REYES, R.T., J.
[39] Re: Administrative Case for Dishonesty and Falsification of Official Document Against Benjamin Katly, A.M. No. 2003-9-SC, March 25, 2004, 426 SCRA 236.
	AM NO. P-06-2104 2006-01-31	JUDGE JOSELITO S. SALVADOR v. ROMANCITO M. SERRANO PER CURIAM
We have repeatedly said that persons involved in the dispensation of justice, from the highest official to the lowest clerk, must live up to the strictest standards of integrity, probity, uprightness, honesty and diligence in the public service. This Court will not tolerate dishonesty for the Judiciary expects the best from all its employees. [25]