This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2004-10-06 |
TINGA, J, |
||||
| Since Pe has committed two counts of habitual tardiness, the appropriate penalty is suspension. Considering that she has been in the government service for eight (8) years[10] and has not been previously charged administratively, a suspension of twenty (20) days is appropriate.[11] | |||||
|
2004-09-30 |
TINGA, J. |
||||
| 3rd Offense - Dismissal It appearing that Javeñar has committed two counts of habitual tardiness, the penalty should be suspension. Considering that he has been in the government service for six (6) years and he has not been previously charged administratively, suspension of twenty (20) days is appropriate.[7] | |||||