This case has been cited 1 times or more.
2016-02-10 |
BRION, J. |
||||
While this Court recognizes the right of MERALCO as a public utility to collect system losses, the courts cannot and will not blindly grant a public utility's claim for differential billing if there is no sufficient evidence to prove entitlement.[18] As MERALCO failed to sufficiently prove its claim for payment of the differential billing, we rule that the respondents cannot be held liable for the billed amount. |