Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

RE: REPORT ON FINANCIAL AUDIT CONDUCTED IN RTC

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	AM No. P-09-2598 2009-02-12	REPORT ON FINANCIAL AUDIT CONDUCTED IN MCTC-MADDELA PER CURIAM
The Clerk of Court is an important officer in our judicial system. His office is the nucleus of all court activities, adjudicative and administrative. His administrative functions are as vital to the prompt and proper administration of justice as his judicial duties.[1]
	AM NO. P-05-1975 2007-07-26	MARICIS A. ALENIO v. ELADIA T. CUNTING PER CURIAM
As an accountable officer, respondent Cunting was entrusted with the responsibility of collecting money belonging to the court. She exercised a very delicate function, that of being the custodian of the court's funds and revenues, records, properties, and premises. Clerks of court are presumed to know their duty to immediately deposit with the authorized government depositories the various funds they receive for they are not supposed to keep funds in their personal possession.[12] Even undue delay in the remittances of the amounts that they collect at the very least constitutes misfeasance.[13]
	AM NO. P-04-1894 2005-08-09	RE: REPORT ON FINANCIAL AUDIT ON BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS OF MS. ADELINA R. GARROVILLAS SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J.
The Clerk of Court is an important officer in our judicial system. His office is the nucleus of all court activities, adjudicative and administrative. His administrative functions are as vital to the prompt and proper administration of justice as his judicial duties.[7]
	AM NO. P-97-1258 2005-01-31	OCA v. CLERK OF COURT ERMELINA C. BERNARDINO PER CURIAM
A respondent's refusal to face head-on the charges against her is contrary to the principle in criminal law that the first impulse of an innocent man when accused of wrongdoing is to express his innocence at the first opportune time.[55] The flight of respondent Tuazon is a clear indication of her guilt.