Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 184081 2009-06-19	GLOBAL HOLIDAY OWNERSHIP CORPORATION v. METROPOLITAN BANK YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
Metrobank's reliance on Ardiente v. Provincial Sheriff[20] is misplaced. The cited case is merely a reiteration of the general rule, since the parties therein did not stipulate in their mortgage agreement that personal notice of judicial or extrajudicial actions shall be furnished the mortgagor.
	GR NO. 172175 2006-10-09	SPS. EXPEDITO ZEPEDA AND ALICE D. ZEPEDA v. CHINA BANKING CORPORATION YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
Assuming these allegations to be true, petitioners can validly seek the nullification of the foreclosure since the alleged restructuring of their debt would effectively modify the terms of the original loan obligations and accordingly supersede the original mortgage thus making the subsequent foreclosure void. Similarly, the allegation of lack of notice if subsequently proven renders the foreclosure a nullity in line with prevailing jurisprudence.[11]