This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2009-12-03 |
LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J. |
||||
| In Canlas et al. v. Napico Homeowners Association I - XIII, Inc. et al.,[23] this Court ruled that: This new remedy of writ of amparo which is made available by this Court is intended for the protection of the highest possible rights of any person, which is his or her right to life, liberty and security. The Court will not spare any time or effort on its part in order to give priority to petitions of this nature. However, the Court will also not waste its precious time and effort on matters not covered by the writ. | |||||