This case has been cited 2 times or more.
2014-11-26 |
BERSAMIN, J. |
||||
As to what was embraced by the term infrastructure project as used in Presidential Decree No. 1818, the Court has ruled in Francisco, Jr. v. UEM-MARA Philippines Corporation:[23] | |||||
2009-09-17 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
In Francisco, Jr. v. UEM-MARA Philippines Corporation,[20] the Court elucidated the co-equal status of the three branches of government: Considering the co-equal status of the three branches of government, courts may not tread into matters requiring the exercise of discretion of a functionary or office in the executive and legislative branches, unless it is clearly shown that the government official or office concerned abused his or its discretion. x x x |