Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 158956 2009-04-24	ILIGAN CEMENT CORPORATION v. ILIASCOR EMPLOYEES LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
Clearly, the CA can resolve factual issues in special civil actions for certiorari from decisions and resolutions of the NLRC. However, the remand of the case to the CA would only result in further delay. Pursuant to established precedents, we deem it expedient in the interest of speedy justice, to rule on the merits of petitioner's claims based on the records of the case including the pleadings and the evidence submitted by the parties.[30]
	GR NO. 139526 2005-10-25	RAMATEK PHILIPPINES v. MA. ANELIA DE LOS REYES CARPIO, J.
In a number of cases,[17] this Court applied retroactively Circular No. 56-2000. This Circular reckoned the 60-day period to file a petition for certiorari from the date of receipt of the notice of the denial of the motion for reconsideration or new trial, if one was filed. In these cases, this Court ruled that a petition for certiorari which had been filed past the 60-day period under Section 4 of Rule 65, as amended by Circular No. 39-98, was deemed seasonably filed provided it was filed within the 60-day period counted from the date of receipt of the notice of the denial of the motion for reconsideration.