This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2014-11-24 |
LEONEN, J. |
||||
| "The modes of discovery are accorded a broad and liberal treatment."[46] The evident purpose of discovery procedures is "to enable the parties, consistent with recognized privileges, to obtain the fullest possible knowledge of the issues and facts before civil trials"[47] and, thus, facilitating an amicable settlement or expediting the trial of the case.[48] | |||||
|
2014-04-21 |
SERENO, C.J. |
||||
| Petitioner filed its Formal Offer of Evidence on 16 March 2007.[10] On 15 January 2008, the Sandiganbayan ruled that with the exception of some documents,[11] "all Exhibits... are denied admission. The due execution and authenticity of these documents remain challenged since the prosecution failed to show otherwise."[12] On petitioners' Motion for Reconsideration, the Sandiganbayan partly relented and admitted Exhibits "MMM" to "AAAAAAA" (Second Resolution).[13] As certified to by the Chief Administrative Officer of the PCGG,[14] Exhibits "MMM" to "AAAAAAA" were turned over to its Legal Division and include the following: Exh. MMM Memorandum for Hon. Teodoro Pena, signed by Juan C. Tuvera Xerox NNN Undated handwritten letter purportedly written by Glecy R. Tantoco No remarks whether original or photocopy OOO Letter to Ferdinand E. Marcos from Bienvenido Tantoco with handwritten marginal note dated 8 May 1982 No remarks whether original or photocopy PPP Undated letter to "Mam" from "Glecy" Xerox QQQ (missing) | |||||