This case has been cited 1 times or more.
2015-09-09 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
As to whether the 16 voters sought to be excluded from the appropriate bargaining unit are confidential employees,[22] such query is a question of fact, which is not a proper issue in a petition for review under Rule 45 of the Rules.[23] This holds more true in the present case in view of the consistent findings of the Mediator-Arbiter, the SOLE, and the CA. |