Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 178989 2010-03-18	EAGLE RIDGE GOLF v. CA VELASCO JR., J.
The appellate court's assailed action is in no way tainted with grave abuse of discretion, as Eagle Ridge would have this Court believed. Indeed, a certification of non-forum shopping signed by counsel without the proper authorization is defective and constitutes a valid cause for dismissal of the petition.[34]
	GR No. 143538 2009-02-13	VICENTE A. MIEL v. JESUS A. MALINDOG CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
The rule is that failure to file or perfect an appeal within the reglementary period will make the judgment final and executory by operation of law.[20] Perfection of an appeal within the statutory or reglementary period is not only mandatory but also jurisdictional; failure to do so renders the questioned decision/resolution final and executory, and deprives the appellate court of jurisdiction to alter the decision/resolution, much less to entertain the appeal.[21]
	GR No. 159026 2008-02-11	MRS. ALBERTA YANSON v. SECRETARY AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
Moreover, Article 128(b) deliberately employed the word "only" in reference to the requirements for perfection of an appeal in labor standards cases. "Only" commands a restrictive application,[29] giving no room for modification of said requirements.