You're currently signed in as:
User

M.E. HOLDING CORPORATION v. CA

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2011-07-20
PEREZ, J.
Indeed, there is nothing novel in the issues raised in this petition.  Our rulings in Bicolandia Drug Corporation (Formerly Elmas Drug Corporation) v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue,[13] Cagayan Valley Drug Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue,[14] and M.E. Holding Corporation v. Court of Appeals[15] operate as stare decisis[16] with respect to this legal question.
2008-06-12
CARPIO, J.
With the effectivity of RA 9257 on 21 March 2004, there is now a new tax treatment for senior citizens' discount granted by all covered establishments. This discount should be considered as a deductible expense from gross income and no longer as tax credit.[32]  The present case, however, covers the taxable year 1997 and is thus governed by the old law, RA 7432.