Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

LAND BANK OF PHILIPPINES v. HEIRS OF ANGEL T. DOMINGO

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR No. 182209 2012-10-03	LAND BANK OF PHILIPPINES v. EMILIANO R. SANTIAGO LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
The ruling in Land Bank of the Philippines v. Natividad[44] was likewise applied in Land Bank of the Philippines v. Heirs of Angel T. Domingo,[45] when the landowner Domingo filed a Petition for the Determination and Payment of Just Compensation despite his receipt of LBP's partial payment. This Court held that since the amount of just compensation to be paid Domingo had yet to be settled, then the agrarian reform process was still incomplete; thus, it should be completed under Republic Act No. 6657.
	GR No. 188670 2012-03-07	DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM v. HEIRS OF ANGEL T. DOMINGO REYES, J.
Likewise, in the cognate case of Land Bank of the Philippines v. Heirs of Angel T. Domingo,[13] this court held that: LBP's contention that the property was taken on 21 October 1972, the date of effectivity of PD 27, thus just compensation should be computed based on the GSP in 1972, is erroneous. The date of taking of the subject land for purposes of computing just compensation should be reckoned from the issuance dates of the emancipation patents. An emancipation patent constitutes the conclusive authority for the issuance of a Transfer Certificate of Title in the name of the grantee. It is from the issuance of an emancipation patent that the grantee can acquire the vested right of ownership in the landholding, subject to the payment of just compensation to the landowner.
	GR No. 171674 2009-08-04	DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM v. CARMEN S. TONGSON PERALTA, J.
Likewise, in Land Bank of the Philippines vs. Heirs of Angel T. Domingo,[27] this Court ruled: In Land Bank v. Natividad, the Court held that the determination of just compensation "in accordance with RA 6657, and not PD 27 and EO 228, is especially imperative considering that just compensation should be the full and fair equivalent of the property taken from its owner by the expropriator, the equivalent being real, substantial, full and ample." In this same case, this Court also had the occasion to discuss the just compensation for PD 27 lands, thus:
	GR No. 167809 2008-11-27	LAND BANK OF PHILIPPINES v. JOSEFINA R. DUMLAO REYES, R.T., J.
In the recent Land Bank of the Philippines v. Heirs of Angel T. Domingo,[47] We rejected the DAR's valuation of just compensation based on the formula provided by PD No. 27 and EO No. 228. We held then that Section 17 of RA No. 6657 is applicable. The latter law, being the latest law in agrarian reform, should control.