Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

EDI-STAFFBUILDERS INTERNATIONAL v. NLRC

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 178551 2010-10-11	ATCI OVERSEAS CORPORATION v. MA. JOSEFA ECHIN CARPIO MORALES, J.
It is hornbook principle, however, that the party invoking the application of a foreign law has the burden of proving the law, under the doctrine of processual presumption which, in this case, petitioners failed to discharge. The Court's ruling in EDI-Staffbuilders Int'l., v. NLRC[10] illuminates: In the present case, the employment contract signed by Gran specifically states that Saudi Labor Laws will govern matters not provided for in the contract (e.g. specific causes for termination, termination procedures, etc.). Being the law intended by the parties (lex loci intentiones) to apply to the contract, Saudi Labor Laws should govern all matters relating to the termination of the employment of Gran.
	GR No. 167614 2009-03-24	ANTONIO M. SERRANO v. GALLANT MARITIME SERVICES AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
23 days JGB v. NLC[100] 2 years 9 months 15 months 15 months Agoy v. NLRC[101] 2 years 2 months 22 months 22 months EDI v. NLRC, et al.[102] 2 years 5 months 19 months 19 months Barros v. NLRC,
	GR No. 159132 2008-12-18	FE CAYAO-LASAM v. SPS. CLARO AND EDITHA RAMOLETE AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
In EDI-Staffbuilders International, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Commission,[67] in which the National Labor Relations Commission failed to order the private respondent to furnish the petitioner a copy of the Appeal Memorandum, the Court held that said failure deprived the petitioner of procedural due process guaranteed by the Constitution, which could have served as basis for the nullification of the proceedings in the appeal. The same holds true in the case at bar. The Court finds that the failure of the respondents to furnish the petitioner a copy of the Memorandum of Appeal submitted to the PRC constitutes a violation of due process. Thus, the proceedings before the PRC were null and void.