Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

ROGELIO REYES v. NLRC

This case has been cited 7 times or more.

	GR No. 162021 2014-06-16	MEGA MAGAZINE PUBLICATIONS v. MARGARET A. DEFENSOR BERSAMIN, J.
The resolution of the question requires the re-examination and calibration of evidence.[35] Such re-examination and calibration, being of a factual nature, ordinarily lies beyond the purview of the Court's authority in this appeal. Yet, because the documents are already before the Court, we hereby treat the situation as an exception in order to resolve the question promptly and finally instead of still remanding the case to the CA for the re- evaluation and calibration.
	GR No. 185280 2012-01-18	TIMOTEO H. SARONA v. NLRC REYES, J.
As a general rule, this Court is not a trier of facts and a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court must exclusively raise questions of law. Moreover, if factual findings of the NLRC and the LA have been affirmed by the CA, this Court accords them the respect and finality they deserve. It is well-settled and oft-repeated that findings of fact of administrative agencies and quasi-judicial bodies, which have acquired expertise because their jurisdiction is confined to specific matters, are generally accorded not only respect, but finality when affirmed by the CA.[41]
	GR No. 177498 2012-01-18	STOLT-NIELSEN TRANSPORTATION GROUP v. SULPECIO MEDEQUILLO PEREZ, J.
We reiterate once more and emphasize the ruling in Reyes v. National Labor Relations Commission,[22] to wit: x x x [F]indings of quasi-judicial bodies like the NLRC, and affirmed by the Court of Appeals in due course, are conclusive on this Court, which is not a trier of facts.
	GR No. 166108 2010-06-16	SPS. TEOFILO CARPIO AND TEODORA CARPIO v. ANA SEBASTIAN PERALTA, J.
Evidence on hand amply supports the foregoing findings of the DARAB which had been affirmed by the CA. It has been held in Reyes v. National Labor Relations Commission,[10] that: x x x findings of facts of quasi-judicial bodies x x x affirmed by the Court of Appeals in due course, are conclusive on this Court, which is not a trier of facts.
	GR No. 152234 2010-04-15	DIVERSIFIED SECURITY v. ALICIA V. BAUTISTA PERALTA, J.
The Court sees it fit to reiterate and emphasize the oft-repeated ruling in Reyes v. National Labor Relations Commission,[9] to wit: x x x findings of facts of quasi-judicial bodies like the NLRC, and affirmed by the Court of Appeals in due course, are conclusive on this Court, which is not a trier of facts.
	GR No. 162332 2008-08-28	HERBERT SOLAS v. POWER TELEPHONE SUPPLY PHILS. AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
As to the merits of the petition, our oft-repeated ruling, reiterated in Reyes v. National Labor Relations Commission,[9] must be emphasized, to wit:x x x findings of facts of quasi-judicial bodies like the NLRC, and affirmed by the Court of Appeals in due course, are conclusive on this Court, which is not a trier of facts.
	GR No. 176150 2008-06-25	IBARRA P. ORTEGA v. SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSION CARPIO MORALES, J.
It is settled that the Court is not a trier of facts and accords great weight to the factual findings of lower courts or agencies whose function is to resolve factual matters.[41] It is not for the Court to weigh evidence all over again.[42] Moreover, findings of fact of administrative agencies and quasi-judicial bodies, which have acquired expertise because their jurisdiction is confined to specific matters, are generally accorded not only respect but finality when affirmed by the Court of Appeals.[43]