This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2008-11-25 |
CORONA, J. |
||||
| This petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court seeks to set aside the March 11, 2005 decision[1] of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. 72913. | |||||
|
2008-04-08 |
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J. |
||||
| Petitioner assails the ruling of the CA for being based on the faulty premise that respondent incurred tardiness only once when in fact he had done so habitually.[13] Whether respondent had been habitually tardy prior to February 15, 1997 when he reported for work 1½ hours late is purely factual in nature. As such, the Court defers to the concurrent assessments of the LA and NLRC, as affirmed by the CA, for the evaluation of evidence and the appreciation of the credibility of witnesses fall within their expertise.[14] | |||||