This case has been cited 1 times or more.
2012-02-08 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
The general rule that petitions for review only allow the review of errors of law by this Court is not ironclad.[15] Where the issue is shrouded by a conflict of factual perceptions by the lower court or the lower administrative body, such as the NLRC in this case, this Court is constrained to review the factual findings of the Court of Appeals.[16] |