This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2007-08-07 |
VELASCO, JR., J. |
||||
| For double jeopardy to set in, the following requisites must concur: (1) there is a valid complaint or information; (2) the complaint should be filed before a court of competent jurisdiction; (3) the accused has pleaded to the charge; and (4) the accused has been convicted, acquitted, or the case has been dismissed or terminated without the express consent of the accused.[23] | |||||
|
2006-12-14 |
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J. |
||||
| A dismissal with the express consent or upon motion of the accused does not result in double jeopardy, except in two instances, to wit: (1) the dismissal is based on insufficiency of evidence or (2) the case is dismissed for violation of the accused's right to speedy trial. [24] | |||||