This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2005-08-08 |
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J. |
||||
| the petition filed before the CA should now be considered as timely filed. In PCI Leasing and Finance, Inc. vs. Emily Rose Go Ko,[36] the Court, citing Narzoles vs. NLRC,[37] ruled that A.M. No. 00-2-03-SC, being a curative statute should be retroactively applied. | |||||
|
2005-07-08 |
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J. |
||||
| the petition filed before the CA should now be considered as timely filed. In PCI Leasing and Finance, Inc. vs. Emily Rose Go Ko,[36] the Court, citing Narzoles vs. NLRC,[37] ruled that A.M. No. 00-2-03-SC, being a curative statute should be retroactively applied. | |||||