You're currently signed in as:
User

PCI LEASING v. EMILY ROSE GO KO

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2005-08-08
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
the petition filed before the CA should now be considered as timely filed.  In PCI Leasing and Finance, Inc. vs. Emily Rose Go Ko,[36] the Court, citing Narzoles vs. NLRC,[37] ruled that A.M. No. 00-2-03-SC, being a curative statute should be retroactively applied.
2005-07-08
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
the petition filed before the CA should now be considered as timely filed.  In PCI Leasing and Finance, Inc. vs. Emily Rose Go Ko,[36] the Court, citing Narzoles vs. NLRC,[37] ruled that A.M. No. 00-2-03-SC, being a curative statute should be retroactively applied.