This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2009-03-30 |
CARPIO MORALES, J. |
||||
| x x x x[34] From a consideration of complainant's second ground of her complaint vis a vis respondent's explanation thereon, the Court finds that complainant is assailing the correctness of respondent's exercise of judicial discretion in issuing the questioned Order of September 22, 2005. Any perceived errors in the exercise of such discretion cannot be reviewed and corrected through the present administrative case, however,[35] but via judicial recourse, such as an appeal or a petition for certiorari, which is an adequate remedy in law.[36] | |||||
|
2006-08-16 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
| Indeed, we have held that the filing of an administrative complaint against a judge is not an appropriate remedy where judicial recourse is still available, such as a motion for reconsideration, an appeal, or a petition for certiorari, unless it appears that the assailed order or decision is tainted with bad faith, fraud, malice or dishonesty.[30] | |||||