This case has been cited 3 times or more.
2009-07-30 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
Sheriff Jundarino undeniably failed to substantiate the allegations in his Comment. He could have easily submitted evidence in support of his defense - such as affidavits of people who could attest as to where he was on 12 February 2008, or of people who were with him during his 27 March 2008 visit to Quilo's residence - but he utterly failed to do so. The basic rule is that mere allegation is not evidence and is not equivalent to proof.[16] | |||||
2009-06-30 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
Sheriff Jundarino undeniably failed to substantiate the allegations in his Comment. He could have easily submitted evidence in support of his defense - such as affidavits of people who could attest as to where he was on 12 February 2008, or of people who were with him during his 27 March 2008 visit to Quilo's residence - but he utterly failed to do so. The basic rule is that mere allegation is not evidence and is not equivalent to proof.[16] | |||||
2006-04-25 |
CARPIO MORALES, J. |
||||
It is settled that the existence of a tenancy relationship cannot be presumed. There must be evidence to prove it.[32] Mere allegation is not evidence nor equivalent to proof.[33] |