Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 166838 2011-06-15	STA. LUCIA REALTY v. CITY OF PASIG LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
For review is the June 30, 2004 Decision [1] and the January 27, 2005 Resolution [2] of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 69603, which affirmed with modification the August 10, 1998 Decision [3] and October 9, 1998 Order [4] of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Pasig City, Branch 157, in Civil Case No. 65420.
	GR No. 166838 2011-06-15	STA. LUCIA REALTY v. CITY OF PASIG LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
On November 28, 1995, Pasig filed a Complaint, [9] docketed as Civil Case No. 65420, against Sta. Lucia for the collection of real estate taxes, including penalties and interests, on the lots covered by TCT Nos. 532250, 598424, 599131, 92869, 92870 and 38457, including the improvements thereon (the subject properties).
	GR NO. 160805 2006-11-24	SPS. ADIEL DE LA CENA AND CARIDAD AREVALO DE LA CENA v. SPS. JOSE BRIONES AND HERMINIA LLEDO BRIONES QUISUMBING, J.
In addition, a contract of sale is perfected by mere consent, upon a meeting of the minds on the object of the contract and the price.[13] When the Arevalos accepted the P1,260 as downpayment, they had agreed to the sale of the contested portion to respondents. In fact, the contract of sale had already been consummated. Hence, its enforcement cannot be barred by the Statute of Frauds, which applies only to an executory agreement.[14]