Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

DINAH C. BARRIGA v. SANDIGANBAYAN

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR Nos. 167860-65 2008-06-17	PEOPLE v. TEDDY M. PAJARO YNARES-SATIAGO, J.
d.) He has appropriated, taken, misappropriated or consented, or through abandonment or negligence, permitted another person to take them.[31]
	GR No. 171437 2007-10-04	HERMES E. FRIAS v. PEOPLE CORONA, J.
In Barriga v. Sandiganbayan,[34] we held that public officers are accountable if they, as part of their duties, receive public funds or property which they are bound to account for but fail to do so.[35]
	GR NO. 162212 2007-01-30	GABRIEL L. DUERO v. PEOPLE QUISUMBING, J.
The elements of the offense of malversation of public funds are as follows: (1) the offender is a public officer; (2) he has the custody or control of the funds or property by reason of the duties of his office; (3) the funds or property involved are public funds or property for which he is accountable; and (4) he has appropriated, taken or misappropriated, or has consented to, or through abandonment or negligence, permitted the taking by another person of, such funds or property.[34]
	GR No. 157399 2005-11-17	PEOPLE v. JOSE TING LAN UY YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
a.] The offender is a public officer; b.] He has the custody or control of funds or property by reason of the duties of his office; c.] The funds or property involved are public funds or property for which he is accountable; and d.] He has appropriated, taken or misappropriated, or has consented to, or through abandonment or negligence, permitted the taking by another person of, such funds or property.[8] Appellant insists that he could not be convicted under the allegations in the information without violating his constitutional right to due process and to be informed of the accusation against him. He points out that the information alleges willful and intentional commission of the acts complained of while the judgment found him guilty of inexcusable negligence amounting to malice.