This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2008-02-04 |
TINGA, J, |
||||
| Contrary to petitioners' assertion, the appeal bond is not merely procedural but jurisdictional. Without said bond, the NLRC does not acquire jurisdiction over the appeal.[23] Indeed, non-compliance with such legal requirements is fatal and has the effect of rendering the judgment final and executory.[24] It must be stressed that there is no inherent right to an appeal in a labor case, as it arises solely from the grant of statute.[25] | |||||
|
2007-10-15 |
YNARES-SATIAGO, J. |
||||
| The Court has invariably ruled that perfection of an appeal within the statutory or reglementary period is not only mandatory but also jurisdictional; failure to do so renders the questioned decision/final order final and executory, and deprives the appellate court of jurisdiction to alter the judgment or final order, much less to entertain the appeal.[20] True, this rule had been relaxed but only in highly meritorious cases to prevent a grave injustice from being done.[21] Such does not obtain in this case. | |||||