Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	AM No. 03-7-170-MCTC 2009-07-14	RE: REPORT ON JUDICIAL AUDIT CONDUCTED IN MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT PER CURIAM
Pursuant to A.M. No. 02-9-02-SC,[48] this administrative case against respondent as a judge based on grounds which are also grounds for the disciplinary action against members of the Bar, shall be considered as disciplinary proceedings against such judge as a member of the Bar.[49]
	AM No. RTJ-08-2103 2009-02-23	EDNA S.V. OGKA BENITO v. RASAD G. BALINDONG CORONA, J.
Pursuant to A.M. No. 02-9-02-SC,[30] this administrative case against respondent as a judge, based on grounds which are also grounds for disciplinary action against members of the Bar, shall be considered as disciplinary proceedings against such judge as a member of the Bar.[31]
	AM No. RTJ-08-2137 2009-02-10	HEIRS OF SPS. JOSE AND CONCEPCION OLORGA v. JUDGE ROLINDO D. BELDIA CORONA, J.
Pursuant to A.M. No. 02-9-02-SC,[33] this administrative case against respondent as a judge, based on grounds which are also grounds for the disciplinary action against members of the Bar, shall be considered as disciplinary proceedings against such judge as a member of the Bar.[34]