Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 170014 2009-07-03	RENITA DEL ROSARIO v. MAKATI CINEMA SQUARE CORPORATION CORONA, J.
Petitioners never substantiated their allegations. In a similar case, Schering Employees Labor Union (SELU) et al. v. Schering Plough Corporation,[41] petitioner Sereneo, the president of SELU, charged respondent with ULP and illegal dismissal because she was in the process of renegotiating the CBA with respondent when she was dismissed on the ground of loss of trust and confidence. We said:Petitioners' accusation of union busting is bereft of any proof. We scanned the records very carefully and failed to discern any evidence to sustain such charge.
	GR No. 174585 2007-10-19	FEDERICO M. LEDESMA v. NLRC HONS. RAUL T. AQUINO CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
While this Court is not unmindful of the rule that in cases of illegal dismissal, the employer bears the burden of proof to prove that the termination was for a valid or authorized cause in the case at bar, however, the facts and the evidence did not establish a prima facie case that the petitioner was dismissed from employment.[31] Before the private respondent must bear the burden of proving that the dismissal was legal, petitioner must first establish by substantial evidence the fact of his dismissal from service. Logically, if there is no dismissal, then there can be no question as to the legality or illegality thereof.