Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 168433 2009-02-10	UCPB GENERAL INSURANCE CO. v. ABOITIZ SHIPPING CORP. EAGLE EXPRESS LINES TINGA, J.
In Philippine Charter Insurance Corporation v. Chemoil Lighterage Corporation,[16] petitioner, as subrogee of Plastic Group Phil., Inc. (PGP), filed suit against respondent therein for the damage found on a shipment of chemicals loaded on board respondent's barge. Respondent claimed that no timely notice in accordance with Art. 366 of the Code of Commerce was made by petitioner because an employee of PGP merely made a phone call to respondent's Vice President, informing the latter of the contamination of the cargo. The Court ruled that the notice of claim was not timely made or relayed to respondent in accordance with Art. 366 of the Code of Commerce.
	GR No. 168402 2008-08-06	ABOITIZ SHIPPING CORPORATION v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA REYES, R.T., J.
In the case of Philippine Charter Insurance Corporation (PCIC) v. Chemoil Lighterage Corporation,[35] the notice was allegedly made by the consignee through telephone. The claim for damages was denied. This Court ruled that such a notice did not comply with the notice requirement under the law. There was no evidence presented that the notice was timely given. Neither was there evidence presented that the notice was relayed to the responsible authority of the carrier.